My reaction to Dan Gilmore’s New York Times link “How the White House Embraced Disputed Arms Intelligence” is so much different. There is usually always at least two sides to every decision, and ultimately one of them is picked. The article does little to shed much light on to the opposing view because “they” are already convinced there is a conspiracy and tell the truth isn’t part of “their” agenda.

Some additional interesting info I came across in my post search after the above article: Rumsfeld Statement; Saddam Possessed WMD, Had Extensive Terror Ties; and Teresa Heinz Kerry is speaking in public again (Washington Times).